Abstract:
هدفت هذه الورقة إلى تحديد أوجه الخلاف بين ابن عقيل والأشموني في أبواب النواسخ الحرفية من شرح ألفية ابن
مالك, معتمداً على المنهج التحليلي. لم يتعصب الشارحان لمدرسة بعينها, على أن الأشموني كان أكثر ميلاً للبصريين
فقد وافقهم في مسألتين, فذهب إلي القول ببناء اسم لالنافية مبني لا معرب, وقال بزيادة الام في خبر إن ولكن,
على حين اكتفي ابن عقيل بعرض الخلاف دون ترجيح, كذلك لم يتعصب الشارحان للجمهور ضد من خالفهم ؛ فقد
وافقهم ابن عقيل في مسألة واحدة هي منعهم إعمال)لا( في المعرفة.وافق الأشموني الجمهور في مسألة, فجوز تقديم
معمول خبر إن إن كان شبه جملة علي اسمها ومنعه ابن عقيل, و خالف الشارحان ابن مالك في مواضع كثيرة مما
يستدل به على تفرد شخصيتيهما، وأخذا عليه كثيراً من المآخذ ؛ أهمها اختلاف قوليه في المسألة بين الألفية
وغيرها من مؤلفاته، وكانت مآخذ الأشموني أكثر من مآخذ ابن عقيل، وأوردا جملة من ملاحظات التصويب
والتعقب. وقد كان الأشموني أكثر اهتماماً بتفصيل آراء النحويين, فكثرت تفاصيل المسائل النحوية في شرحه.
Using analytical method, the researcher targets at determining the differences
in views between IBN-Aquil and AL-Ashmoony in the subject of AL-nwasikh
ALharfia in their interpretation of ALfiat Ibn Malik. No one of thet two interpreters
stood in fanaticism to support any one of the two rival grammar schools but
Ashmoony appears to be more inclined to the "Basrian school", where he agreed
with them on two different matters that the Kofe's school would not agree with
.
As for IBN- Aquil, he joined the Basrians on only one debated questions .and
he kept away from dealing with all other points that were in dispute between the
Basrians and Kofes. Both interpreters counterpoise between the congregation and
the grammarians who were opposing their views. IBN-Aquil was in an agreement
with the congregation, on one of questionable matters . For the rest of the debatable
questions he is seen to have kept himself away without speaking his mind. On the
other hand, AL-Ashmoony agreed with the congregation on one of the points argued
and , while refraining from giving any thoughts about one. Both scholars opposed
IBN-Malik in his dealing with so many grammatical issues. This strict opposition to
IBN-Malik shows how independent and unique those men were. They had a lot to
take against him. The most significant of which was his self contradiction on one of
the grammatical issues in his ALFIA and some other written works of his, in general,
AL-Ashmoony picked out more drawbacks in IBN-Malik's works than what IBN
Oquail did The two scholars recorded many corrective remarks and elaborations
on IBN-Malik's work, and there we can detect that AL-Ashmoony was much more
particular about verifying and detailing other grammarian's ideas. so, many minute
details can be traced in explanations that are associated with the different topics.
